Talk:Michael Robertson (businessman)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Citations[edit]

lawsuit was filed in San Diego court. Lawsuit not publicly available yet. There was a police report filed on the matter.

Is there any verifiable third party source for this bit? et.

emacsuser (talk) 10:30, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, that is pure rubbish. Edits undone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.181.212.144 (talk) 18:57, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nabster[edit]

"Some believed that MP3.com received unfair treatment by being lumped in with the Napster copyright case which took place during the same period.[citation needed] Others noted that the ruling came from the 2nd Circuit District Court in New York, which is media company, not technology, friendly.[citation needed]

Some have speculated that a different outcome was likely if the case had been tried in the 9th Circuit Court (a federal district court that serves the West Coast) instead of the 2nd Circuit Court (a federal district court that serves the East Coast)."

perhaps the above should be deleted unless citations can be found. i have searched and been unable to find such citations.



"Michael Robertson (born 1967) is the founder and former CEO of MP3.com. He started Lindows.com, Inc., producer of Linspire (originally Lindows), in October 2001 in San Diego, California, U.S.. He went on to found SIPphone, MP3tunes, and Ajax 13." This is a very bad introductory text: it contains too many abbreviations and is poorly written. Anyone want to change this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.210.160.209 (talk) 18:01, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could this be clarified: ...the 2nd Circuit in New York which is media company .... I'm confused... 2nd Circuit court is a media company? What did the poster intend?

The "2nd Circuit Court" is a USA Federal Court, not a company. See United_States_federal_courts. Jebba 22:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

clarified as to both —Preceding unsigned comment added by TeamUnderhill (talkcontribs) 20:16, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed text that the writer sites his own blog as a source. Many additions were posted by one person that is not a neutral third party but someone with a vendeta trying to smear Mr. Robertson's reputation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leslieaudra (talkcontribs) 14:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Michael Robertson (businessman). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]