Talk:Michelle Chang (Tekken)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled[edit]

It's ridiculous to include this entry as part of the Native American wiki project. Your time could be better spent writing actual articles about real Native Americans. Huangdi 05:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Don't Know[edit]

Well, it seems to be a good idea, but Michelle Chang and Juila Chang are two completely different characters, each with their own past histories. Plus, since Juila is set to be featured in future Tekken games, and Michelle's run in the Tekken series is over, Juila's profile is set to be updated with more information- the article should be about Juila and Juila only- yet only briefly mention Michelle Chang in her profile (in which an link to Michelle's file should be accessable, in which exists today).

Merging the two articles seems to be a good idea, but I don't know....I mean, with two different characters and all...I don't know.

I really don't mind merging the "Michelle Chang" article with the "Julia Chang" article. Besides, they are similar to each other and both profiles would look better and more organised.

Well, we've failed to reach concensus regarding this matter, so I'm going to remove the tag. -ZeroTalk 01:15, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Someone needs to explain the whole age changing because if Nina Williams is really 40 and Michelle is actually younger than here why is Michelle older than Nina's real age?

Michelle and Julia deserve an article each. They are different characters. - The 4th Snake

You can't merge two tekken characters together!86.130.242.6 00:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle doesn't need to be merged with Julia. They both need an article each. They are different characters with different names. As for the Nina Williams / Michelle thing, Michelle was 20 in Tekken 2, and she's 41 if she's still alive. Nina was 22 in Tekken 2, and currently 43 / 24 (her real age is 43, but the cryosleep kept her from aging for 19 years, so she's 24.). KristiRenee 13:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Michelle2.jpg[edit]

Image:Michelle2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Michellettt.jpg[edit]

Image:Michellettt.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:13, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Michellettt.jpg[edit]

Image:Michellettt.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Michelle Chang (Tekken). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michelle Chang (Tekken). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:40, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]