Talk:Microcosmic orbit

Untitled

Was this cut and pasted from somewhere? I ask because it seems to have footnote numbers in parentheses that may have been links on the site it came from. If so, it must be deleted as a copyvio. —Hanuman Das 13:52, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

No, this article was created from scratch. Jzkramer 23:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Citations needed

Added 'citation needed' tags in a few places. They could have been placed in several other places also. Please see WP:CITE for information on how to add references, and what qualifies as a citable source. Also see WP:VERIFY for the need to verify information in an encyclopedia article. Uncited statements can be removed after a reasonable length of time.

I also changed the unprovable "The Microcosmic Orbit or Circulation of Light meditation is the Taoist Qigong version of the Kriya Yoga breathing technique" to the possibly provable "The Microcosmic Orbit or Circulation of Light meditation is the Taoist Qigong breathing technique said by some to be similar to the Kriya Yoga breathing technique. " It will still need a citation.

For the same reason, I changed "The primary difference between the Microcosmic Orbit technique and the Kriya Yoga technique is that the Qigong practitioner often practices the meditation in a standing posture, while the Kriya Yogi practices the technique in the seated lotus or half-lotus posture" to "One difference between the Microcosmic Orbit technique and the Kriya Yoga technique is that the Qigong practitioner often practices the meditation in a standing posture, while the Kriya Yogi typically practices in a sitting posture."

ॐ Priyanath 20:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Good points, thankyou. Jzkramer 23:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the reference. Can you please add the exact quote and page number where Mantak Chia says that this is 'similar to the Kriya Yoga breathing technique'? It can go inside the 'ref' tags, so the reader can see it at the bottom of the page under 'Notes'. That way, it's clear that Mantak Chia made that exact statement (rather than someone concluding that the techniques seemed similar, which would Original Research). Thanks, ॐ Priyanath 23:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Priyanath. Now tell me what have you and other editors got against this Shitole character? It seems that he has been strongly criticised in Wikipedia but no evidence why. Jzkramer 00:02, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

You're probably referring to an edit dispute where a devotee of Shitole was trying to insert uncited, unencyclopedic, and probably untrue material into the Kriya Yoga article and into Shitole's own biography. Since this is an encyclopedia, new information needs to be cited, WP:CITE, and verified, WP:VERIFY. Even now, his biography, Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath is full of unreferenced claims, and claims that are strongly POV and unproveable. I've added a standard Wikipedia 'welcome' message on your talk page that explains what Wikipedia is, and isn't, and how to add information to articles that is encyclopedic. ॐ Priyanath 00:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Poor article

This is a very poor article and needs a complete rewrite. It is a comparison with Kriya Yoga. Should every article about a method in WP be a comparison with Kriya Yoga? This just comes across as spam. --Simon D M (talk) 18:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Have cut out the spam. --Simon D M (talk) 18:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

I would have to agree, even with the obvious editing it's still a pretty poor article. Firstly that Zhang Zhong book is a pretty lightweight affair of nice pictures, drawings and a lot of waffle about 'energy' but I cannot find any references to the microcosmic orbit at all, page reference anyone? Also the author of the article seems to have the breathing technique muddled the wrong way round as energy rises on inhalation and vice versa. There are much better books and references to much earlier works which describe these techniques such as Lu kuan Yu and Da liu which Mantak Chia can hardly be said to do justice to. In my opinion the whole article needs re-writing with proper references and links to other articles on similar subjects such as chinese alchemy and neidan. Chuangzu (talk) 22:57, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

I have completely re-written the article removing any spurious references to Yoga and adding references to books written by well known Taoist masters. Chuangzu (talk) 22:11, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Specific issues noticed

This is a worthy start for this subject however a citation is needed for paragraph 1. Also Taoist Alchemy and Chinese Alchemy are used, one or the other would be better for cohesiveness. There is a style issue in paragraphs 6, the second sentence is wordy. A citation is needed for paragraph 9. The first sentence of the last paragraph is a run-on sentence and this paragraph also needs a citation. The last line of this entry states an opinion as fact in Wikipedia's voice. The opinion should be attributed to the text from which it came instead. WordsUnited (talk) 11:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Chinese character issue

From History section: “For example the Chinese character for the I Ching hexagram number 5, Waiting, depicts a person sitting in meditation”. Does it? Because the character in question appears to be 需, which depicts no such thing. My Chinese is a little rusty, but: according to shufaji.com, it originally depicted a person sweating from illness, meaning 'weak' or 'soft'; the current form of the character is comprised of 雨 and 而, 'rain' and 'beard'. As far as I can tell the character's history/evolution has never been connected with meditation. Headbeater (talk) 13:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Microcosmic orbit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080626185911/http://www.duversity.org/elixir/ to http://duversity.org/elixir/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Misleading Content

This article implies various aspects about historical meditation in China that is incorrect.

It says: "The history of the microcosmic orbit dates back to prehistoric times in China." Where is the evidence for that?

It says: "The underlying principles can be found in the I Ching and than quotes: "I Ching hexagram number 5" and gives:

"The commentary on the Image for hexagram 5 reveals the entire process of meditation. "The clouds rise up to heaven" symbolizes the meditator's energy rising upward as it evaporates into the head, where it is distilled into a saliva like nectar (referred to in the phrase "the superior man eats and drinks"), which returns to the abdomen. " It furthers one to cross the great water" alludes to crossing the great water of the abdomen and mouth."

This is very misleading. Hexagram number 5 actually says: 雲上於天，需；君子以飲食宴樂。A translation is, "The clouds ascend to heaven (and form) "Xu" (the name of the hexagram); the Gentleman, eats, feasts and enjoys himself." How one can take this as evidence for meditation and relate it to the microscopic orbit is beyond me. Therefore I see it as very misleading.

In Lao Zi, there is no specific lines in regards to detailing meditation and especially anything alluding to energy traveling through channels. One could argue he discusses breathing in chapter 11 where he says, "In concentrating you breath to attain softness, can you be like an infant?"

The list goes on......... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theramsden (talk • contribs) 10:09, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Removed reference to Lao Zi and Zhuang Zi

I have removed the reference to Lao Zi and Zhuang Zi as there is simply no mention of these ideas in the original text (which I can read and have published translations of). [Laozi and Zhuang Zhou have also alluded to the technique of meditation and encouraging circulation of energy through the psychic meridians in their writings. For example, Zhuang Zhou's chapter entitled Yang Sheng Chu or "Principles of Health and Longevity" states: "Use your mind to carry the vital energy along your Tu Mo upward constantly"] Larsbo c (talk) 00:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)