4/18/16. RandalwikiM has challenged a producer of supplements on the size and safety of the microcrystalline cellulose in their products. He is awaiting their response. ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RandalwikiM (talk • contribs) 04:11, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a link to original research done for a patient in 2012. You may call or write the clinic to verify this information (I presume, I did not ask permission). I have removed the "ideal excipient" sentence since possible allergic reactions are not ideal. I DO have permission from the patient. Jenkstom (talk) 15:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

'ideal excipient' paragraph is unclear[edit]

It's not made clear how (or even if) the properties listed make it an 'ideal' excipient. 'ideal' also implies optimality, so it should be stated why it fulfills the requirements of an excipient.

Xbao (talk) 00:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Allergy information[edit]

Citing a single mention of an allergic reaction inside its own section has no place in the article imho. Singulary (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]