Talk:Midland Railway – Butterley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit]

Added this tag as it reads like an advert... "Also in the former Butterley goods yard is the Trust's Carriage and Wagon department where our rolling stock is maintained" 90.194.147.110 (talk) 17:50, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

moved to article
An explanation to that may be that the article appears (by a recent edit summary) to be maintained by members of staff of the Midland Railway. I will look into this further, as it may be a serious WP:COI.
BG7 15:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced...[edit]

The article requires references or else it may be deleted. It does not matter who updates it - how do any other users know you are who you say you are? I could say that I was Jimbo Wales, our founder, but that doesn't mean I am...

Further removal of tags will result in consequences.

BG7 15:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right, wikipedia articles need to be referenced from reliable sources see Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Attribution. Richerman (talk) 16:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

debate?[edit]

Don't understand this debate ... if we have Midland railway staff then presumably they know where their information comes from. If no references are supplied then it would appear to prove the lack of a reliable source and authorship. Note the opening sentence of the article is a tautology (ie it says A=A because A is a type of A. It needs an explanation/definition of what the article/list is about. Hope this article grows ... Victuallers (talk) 12:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it says 'there are some objects contained within A, which itself is contained within B", where B is the Midland Railway Centre. Maybe it needs another article, starting with 'The Midland Railway Centre contains the Midland Railway, Butterley, the National Forklift Truck Museum and the Golden Valley Railway.' Except that it might encourage somebody to write a list of forklift trucks.Ning-ning (talk) 13:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Midland Railway Centre website's History section states that the Midland Railway Trust started and expanded the Centre, which does in fact contain the entire MR(B) from Pye Bridge to Ironville, and other attractions including a farm and a country park. So the redirect from MRC to MR(B) should be replaced by an article on the MRC. Ning-ning (talk) 14:53, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article should be renamed Midland Railway - Butterley and the two other pages Midland Railway, Butterley and Midland Railway Centre made into redirects. Altyelecy (talk) 1849, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Improving the article[edit]

This article certainly needs improvement and expansion. At present it is little more than a list of preserved locomotives and rolling stock. Some historical context would be useful: the history of the line prior to closure, developments leading up to its reopening, and expansion since the early days of the Midland Railway Centre. An indication of published future plans and aspirations would also be helpful. Perhaps looking at other heritage railway articles would be a guide, including Ecclesbourne Valley Railway, a line not far away, which has an article which is far from perfect, but certainly more comprehensive than this one. Skinsmoke (talk) 14:19, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Midland Railway – Butterley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]