Talk:Migration Period art

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

British Isles[edit]

1)From British Isles (terminology):

[British Isles] is the oldest of any of the terms discussed here, being recorded in a Greek text of 325 BC in the form Pretanikai nesoi (Pretanic isles). As this term predates any known political conflict on the islands, many people feel they can use it neutrally as geographical term

British Isles had currency in the period. Since we are discussing a topic that occurred in the 5th century AD, I don't see how anyone could take offense with the term, it is fairly neutral for the period in question and predates any political conflicts that may be of concern. British Isles is also the term used in the Dictionary of the Middle Ages encyclopedia article on this topic and thus also what is commonly used in the world of art historians, the field of the topic in question.

-- Stbalbach 17:18, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot see any problem in saying Great Britian and Ireland, and I will change it again if you revert again, period. Bluegold 17:59, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stbalbach, I believe you are from the United States of America, I would hope that you would have the common courtesy and decency to recognize and honor my country as I recognize and honor yours. Also I see you have deleted several complaints from your talk page. - Bluegold 19:10, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bluegold, you have not made it clear what the problem is so let me ask you to clarify. "common courtesy and decency to recognize and honor my country" - what does that mean, how is that an issue? It's very clear from what I wrote above, and what is written in the article -- did you even read the latest revision? you reverted cited material -- that the concept is being used as cited and sourced by mainstream art historians in a neutral manner. It's not saying what your suggesting it's saying, in fact, just the opposite, it could not be more clear. As for my talk page, I don't permit people to use my talk page over content disputes and carry them over from article discussions into my talk page in an attempt to bully through an intellectual discussion; those are demagog and ad hominem tactics that avoid the issue at hand. -- Stbalbach 02:57, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The term 'British Isles' was never used until about 1500's. Most of the art on the page is of old Ireland anyway. It's easy to pick a couple of references from 2000 years ago, but it doesn't prove the case for the British Isles. It originally was a political term, during a time when the great art works of Ireland were being plundered and smelted down for the enritchment of a forign nonelected ruling class. Bel air 20:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, well, this is not the place or forum to appeal to the sympathies of a cause; it is certainly a tragedy that Ireland lost artwork, seriously, but can we stick to the topic at hand? British Isles (terminology) tells us where the term came from and when (Greek, 2nd Century BC), and the term is appropriate for use in this article about the "dark ages", as supported by cited references, as a neutral descriptor, because it predates any modern-era political concerns. I just can't believe that your trying to black-wash this term as being entirely pejorative with no legitimate usage. At Wikipedia, we report on what other people do, not what we think the world should do. The term British Isles is appropriate in the context of this article, as evidenced by cited sources, and by our very own Wikipedia article on the term. -- Stbalbach 22:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smile, :)) don't get too worked up!!! Bel air 23:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Frankish.grave.goods.jpg[edit]

Image:Frankish.grave.goods.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gothic.fibula.jpg[edit]

Image:Gothic.fibula.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Migration Period art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]