Talk:Mike Gallagher (political commentator)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Should this be mentioned? http://www.newshounds.us/2006/12/19/fox_guest_says_joy_behar_matt_damon_keith_olbermann_should_be_rounded_up_and_put_in_a_detention_center_because_theyre_traitors.php

It would do to elaborate on his views that are expressed in his book and on his radio show. As usual, I don't have time or desire to do it, but I'd encourage interested parties to go ahead and do it (while maintaining NPOV of course). 202.81.18.30 04:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quite frankly, I think this would make more sense in the Treason article, maybe along with Ann Coulter's comments in the book with that name. Doesn't make much sense here—--it's not biographical enough. Fleetflame (talk) 03:02, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this article not considered biased? This seems to just be a listing of his charitable gestures, which is OK, but shouldn't it at least be under a section with that name? Seems like this needs to be rewritten again. Fleetflame (talk) 02:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

== POV check requested ==i think this is one of the most biased article i have ever read about anyone. why is the left doing his bio. unfair and inaccurate and makes him sound like a nazi and i listen every day. his son never said he was going to join the military and if he did mike would have supported him 100 percent. you all are nuts and biased.


See my comments above....I think the mention of the WBC and Gallagher should at least go in a seperate section. It's not like this was his life's peak. Fléêťflämẽ U-T-C 00:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does anybody know who, if anybody, Mike supported in the Republican primaries?[edit]

↜Just me, here, now 04:12, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Gallagher's original name is Michael Smeltsor. Every time I edit his page to add "nee Smeltsor" it is automatically deleted. This is unfair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.183.141 (talk) 14:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming activities[edit]

This person is sending unsolicited e-mails to people without any effective possibility of unsubscribing.

From THeditor@townhallmail.com Fri Feb 25 23:33:55 2011 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:33:47 +0200 (EET) From: Mike Gallagher <THeditor@townhallmail.com> To: Lebatsnok <lebatsnok@nospam.org> Subject: Mike Gallagher Newsletter

   [ The following text is in the "UTF-8" character set. ]
   [ Your display is set for the "ISO-8859-13" character set.  ]
   [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

a


      topad


[Mike_Online_Image__.jpg] podcasts

       [Gallagher_Newsletter_Cancer_Treatment_728x90_6.19.2009.jpg]

Mike Gallagher's Weekly Update

The Mike Gallagher show is now on Facebook and Twitter. Check it out by clicking below:

[WORL_Facebook_100x63_9.7.2010.jpg] [APPLE_Twitter_100x63_8.2.2010.jpg]

Edit protection[edit]

Put a semi protection lock on this page because Mike Gallagher has been complaining that his page on here keeps on getting messed up on here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.162.206.167 (talk) 18:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Radio Show Broadcast Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace discusses the Wisconsin protestors. Pastor Stephen Broden talks about the anti-abortion billboards he placed in New York targeting African-Americans. Welcome to Obamacare: new organ donor rules would favor younger patients over the old. Death panels?

Featured Articles from the Mike Gallagher Show

Who Rules America? The AARP The great question haunting Washington's budget debate is whether our elected politicians will take back government from the AARP, the 40 million-member organization that represents retirees and near-retirees.

A seminal showdown between public unions and taxpayers: For Americans who don't think the welfare state riots of France or Greece can happen here, we recommend a look at the union and Democratic Party spectacle now unfolding in Wisconsin. Over the past few days, thousands have swarmed the state capital and airwaves to intimidate lawmakers and disrupt Governor Scott Walker's plan to level the playing field between taxpayers and government unions. Major Hasan, 'Star Officer': In a month of momentous change, it was easy to overlook the significance of another revolutionary event. Who would have believed that in the space of a few weeks the leaders of the three major European powers would publicly denounce multiculturalism and declare, in so many words, that it was a proven disaster and a threat to society?

MikeOnline.com Be sure to visit www.mikeonline.com, Mike's home on the web, for the very latest from his national radio show. You can find out what Mike is discussing on the program, and get the latest news on his appearances around the country. Plus, check out Mike's latest articles and his blog. Of course, if you want more Mike, you can sign up to become a premium subscriber and a member of Gallagher˙s World to get the latest podcasts of Mike's every day. Go to www.mikeonline.com for more information. gallagher's links [Gallaghers_World_Bottom_Image.jpg]

* 

Gallagher's Blogs

* 

Gallagher's Photos

* 

Gallagher's Army ...More [Gallagher_contacttheshow.jpg] To talk to Mike Gallagher on the radio Call 1-800-655-MIKE


[ndkhqbzthhrnqthtntqfzncppknpptkzjjfbmqrtfyyyrq_srkvblmmbb.gif]

__________________________SUBSCRIPTION INFO__________________________

This newsletter is never sent unsolicited. It was sent to you because you signed up to receive this newsletter on the Townhall.com network OR a friend forwarded it to you.

We respect and value your time and privacy. If this newsletter no longer meets your needs we will be happy to remove your address immediately.

You can UNSUBSCRIBE from this newsletter by clicking here.

OR Send postal mail to: Townhall Unsubscribe 1901 N. Moore St - Suite 701, Arlington, VA 22209

WERE YOU FORWARDED THIS NEWSLETTER? You can get your own free subscription to this newsletter by clicking here.

____________________________________________________________________________

  • Copyright Townhall and its Content Providers.

All rights reserved.

____________________________________________________________________________ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lebatsnok (talkcontribs) 23:54, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Father's name is Smelsner[edit]

Gallagher told Chris Wallace that his original name was Smelsner. His mother was named Gallagher. Fotoguzzi (talk) 16:53, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, previously mentioned on this page. Fotoguzzi (talk) 18:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mike Gallagher (political commentator). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conspicuous omission?[edit]

Am I just missing it (could be), or is no date of birth (not even a year) included in this biographical article? If so, I don’t believe I’ve personally ever encountered this omission before, which seems especially odd as he is a contemporary figure. It’s mot like he lived a thousand years ago in which an estimated date of birth is given. Is there a reason for this seeming oddity? Thank you.HistoryBuff14 (talk) 22:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]