Talk:Military supply-chain management

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

links under notes[edit]

The links (under "notes" on this page) lead to other subjects than mentioned in the links themselves.

Wereldburger758 06:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military transport[edit]

Military supply chain management is not same as military transport which is ab occupation, a branch of applied military engineering and something shared by all four Services. Unless there is objection, I would suggest the removal of redirect.-- mrg3105mrg3105 03:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

links under notes[edit]

Content under links under notes are unavaliable (404 error). I would suggest finding the updated versions of these resources and attaching them when possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:222D:2700:E184:2B2C:D267:DF13 (talk) 19:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Logistics versus supply-chain management" -- a bogus distinction.[edit]

This section is ungrammatical and incorrect.

An SCM-based organization not only having concerns with its immediate clients but also handles and forecasts the factors affecting directly or indirectly their supplier or suppliers or on their client or clients. This sentence having no verb.

If we exclude this information part out of supply chain model then we can see the logistic management part of the business. This is an absurd falsehood. There is no management of anything without a "this information part." The writer confuses "logistic" with "logistics," a solecism that is creeping into dictionaries, I must admit.

"Supply chain management" is post-1982 or so academic jargon for logistics, as simply googling up the terms will show anyone. They are synonyms.


David Lloyd-Jones (talk) 09:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]