Talk:Millbank Tower

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Demolition[edit]

Regarding this edit: The reference (which contains the quote) specifically reads "demolition". Why has this been reverted?--217.155.32.221 (talk) 10:28, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also: the alteration of the indefinite article was unnecessary – see English articles#Distinction between a and an.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 10:35, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because the reference to 'demolition' in the Guardian article is vague and does not fully explain that the proposal does not involve the demolition of the Millbank Tower, which would be understood to involve the complete tearing down of the entire thing. My understanding of it is that there would be demolition of some, mainly exterior, elements, and that these elements would be replaced by new materials/structures largely imitating what was there before. The wording of your edit is simply not accurate. I understand that you may wish to use the word 'demolish' rather than 'redevelop', perhaps because you don't approve of the proposal for political reasons, but the wording needs to explain clearly that this is only partial demolition, with most of the basic structure retained, and new elements being designed to imitate the appearance of what was there before.

Regarding changing 'an' to 'a', I tend to think 'an hotel' sounds a bit antiquated. But if you particularly want it to say 'an hotel', feel free to change it back. Dubmill (talk) 10:50, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are largely correct. The developers are now proposing Reduction in the Scope of Demolition. As it contradicts the existing reference, perhaps this one should go in.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 11:13, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. That reference is better in explaining what is actually proposed. Dubmill (talk) 11:22, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 14:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Millbank Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606104515/http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/infoabout/information_for_researchers/index.htm to http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/infoabout/information_for_researchers/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:34, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How many floors does Millbank Tower have???[edit]

This is a strange Wikipedia article about Millbank Tower - nowhere in the article does it note how many floors the building has. I wonder how many floors it has. Betathetapi454 (talk) 16:04, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]