Talk:Mini Metro (video game)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 02:18, 11 August 2016 (UTC) Hello, I, Tintor2 will review this article. It looks to be in good shape, so I'll probably pass it after seeing issues solved. Here we go:[reply]

  • Can the lead be expanded to be split in at least two paragraphs per WP:Lead? The article is pretty so I think it would be easy.
I've expanded this.
  • Gameplay section: What does "In the Normal play mode"? Is it a diffculty?
It's the name of a game mode. I've added quote marks to emphasise that. The text explains how "Normal" differs from the "Endless" game mode. Tell me if it still isn't clear.
  • Reception: The vg reviews template could be expanded with the ones you used in the prose like "| rev1 = | rev1Score = "
The other reviews didn't give scores.
    • The excellence in audio could also be added with "| award1Pub = | award1 = "
I don't like to use the award entry in the VG reviews template because the text looks too small and cramped. So I prefer to just summarise in prose if there aren't that many awards. That's just my personal preference.
  • Lastly, just an advice. If the development section is too large, I would recommend it to have a subsection.
Usually I would split the development section into subsections, but for this article it seemed better to write it in a chronological order due to the way the game was released. So there isn't really clearly defined subsections for it.

That's all I could gather. Looks like a solid GA. Also if you have some free time could you take a look at my latest peer review? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 02:18, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: I've addressed your comments above. Anything else need to be changed? --The1337gamer (talk) 21:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations. Article became a GA.Tintor2 (talk) 21:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]