Talk:Minimoog Voyager
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The 2 modulation busses are not (sound) effects but modulations of the sound. keyboard velocity to sound character and many other things can be done in this section. This should be changed. I am a user of the Moog Voyager for years and have 25 years synth experience. --Qwave 20:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Request for image[edit]
I've tried to look up a public-domain image for the XL model, but no luck. Anyone got any sources? Thanks. Eddievhfan1984 (talk) 10:37, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Not quite like the original[edit]
Several interesting images found here: http://www.retrosynth.com/~analoguediehard/studio/keyboards/moog_voyager/ These are oscilloscope traces comparing same settings played on voyager and original minimoog simultanously. Lets just say there are some glaring differences, far from subtle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.243.178.205 (talk) 22:58, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Redirection (28 November 2018 ) and bulk deletion (6 December 2018) without any prior discussions[edit]
Your prior edits lacked the honest explanations and the prior discussions. This article should be verified by searching sources. Please discuss before bulk deletions. --Clusternote (talk) 00:10, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi. I think you might not be aware of the Wikipedia rule here.
- Please see WP:BURDEN. It's up to you to provide sources for the section I deleted.
All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution.
Popcornduff (talk) 00:14, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Currently I try to verify and add citations on article. Please stop bulk deletion while my verification. --Clusternote (talk) 00:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Why don't you find all the sources you need, and then restore the text? Popcornduff (talk) 00:19, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Your prior redirection was inappropriate because you didn't try to form a consensus on Talk page, so I undid your redirection and try to verify contents. Please don't bother my effort. --Clusternote (talk) 00:24, 7 December 2018 (UTC)