Talk:Minnesota State Capitol artwork/GA1
GA Review[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Oncamera (talk · contribs) 22:10, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'll will be reviewing this and leaving my recommendations/comments below. oncamera (talk page) 22:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- I added additional details from the article to expand the lead to better summarize article.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- @Oncamera: I have made corrections and additions to the Minnesota State Capitol artwork page based on critiques/feedback of the other Minnesota Capitol pages I sent for review for GA status. Please let me know if there are any changes corrections or additions needed. Thank you for doing the review! Myotus (talk) 20:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for making those changes, they really improved the article. I expanded upon the lead using details already sourced in the article. oncamera (talk page) 01:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Oncamera: I have made corrections and additions to the Minnesota State Capitol artwork page based on critiques/feedback of the other Minnesota Capitol pages I sent for review for GA status. Please let me know if there are any changes corrections or additions needed. Thank you for doing the review! Myotus (talk) 20:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.