Talk:Minnesota United FC (2010–2016)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No new article required for MLS[edit]

Unlike other teams, Seattle, Vancouver, Portland and Montreal, this team was offered the franchise. No new article is required. In fact, I doubt that Montreal needed one either. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orlando City SC was pretty much the same case, wasn't it? Mosmof (talk) 11:30, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It elected to change names when it started playing in MLS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:02, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Minnesota United FC (2010–16). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I posted earlier saying that this article ought to be merged with the Minnesota United FC article. It seems redundant of us to have two separate articles covering the same team over different periods of time. It would be one thing if it was where the teams had different ownership and disbanded with the rise of a phoenix club, a la AFC Wimbledon, Seattle Sounders FC or SV Austria Salzburg, but these two articles of the same involve the same ownership group. Quidster4040 (talk) 17:27, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion should happen in one location. Here or the FC article? I commented there. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:49, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The team exists[edit]

Not only do they exist, they are playing Vancouver FC right now.[1] [2] They should not be referred to in the past tense. Walter Görlitz needs to cite his own sources to show that they don't exist or stop reverting my reversions. Peace and love. Kire1975 (talk) 03:18, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, this team played their last game in 2016. You're talking about a franchise with the same name, Minnesota United FC, that plays in MLS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:43, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Minnesota United FC". ESPN.
  2. ^ "Vancouver v. Minnesota United". Google.
There is an entire subheading titled "Move to Major League Soccer". Your passive aggressive accusations of vandalism on my profile only highlight how ridiculous the fact that there are two pages is. If it's a different team, it could not move to MLS. Kire1975 (talk) 05:30, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not aggressive. Warnings are standard for errors like the one you continue to make. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:27, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]