Talk:Miss Grand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Number of views this month

Contested deletion[edit]

I would like to remind User:Richie Campbell that WP:G4 prohibits re-creation of deleted material, not topics. Previous AfDs do not serve as a perpetual rejection of a topic's notability. For convenience, I quote (with added emphasis:)

This applies to sufficiently identical copies, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion. It excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies, and content that has been moved to user space or converted to a draft for explicit improvement (but not simply to circumvent Wikipedia's deletion policy). This criterion also does not cover content undeleted via a deletion review, or that was only deleted via proposed deletion (including deletion discussions closed as "soft delete") or speedy deletion.

The criterion clearly does not apply to this article. Please avoid indiscriminate G4 tagging of articles unrelated to deleted copies. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Protection[edit]

Please protect this page. Because there are more than 50 languages written around the world about Miss Grand, Thanks EmmyPert (talk) 02:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WEIGHT issues of controversy section[edit]

I've removed a few of the entries of the "Controversey" section, which has ballooned to be larger than the rest of the article (one about one contestant insulting a contestant from a different pageant; that seems more appropriate to be included in articles about those subjects, not this pageant). I also deleted an entry about a fake passport, per WP:NOTNEWS; that doesn't seem to be a "controversey" for the pageant itself, rather a legal matter for the contestant. I also don't believe that a summary of all of the controversy belongs in the lede; to include something like that in the lede, we'd need sources that suggested that this pageant is known primarily for it's controversies, which I'm not convinced of. I'm also curious why this pageant has been targeted with so much criticism, most of it from recent edits; I note that Miss Universe doesn't have a "Controversy" section, despite the Steve Harvey sage that made international news. OhNoitsJamie Talk

The Steve Harvey controversy can be found in the lede of Miss Universe 2015 article and some other controversies including other major pageants were included in the beauty pageant article. On a second look, I agree with you with the fake passport. Regarding the summary of all the controversy in the lede for Miss Grand, the pageant is well-known for controversies in the pageant industry beyond what you read in the article, here's a sample from Rappler. About the "Discrediting Miss Universe," this involved the owner/organizer (Nawat) of Miss Grand and was posted in the official social media account of Miss Grand as per source.Richie Campbell (talk) 05:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend Richie Campbell making and create the new Miss Grand International page in each year and put details the controversy at each page like Miss Universe 2015. EmmyPert (talk) 10:30, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • As per the previous AfD, we do not make sub-articles for pageants that have been deleted as non-notable. Black Kite (talk) 10:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify why Richie Campbell want to delete this page that she report to delete and put all negative things into this page. EmmyPert (talk) 03:35, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 March 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. No consensus to move. Notability can be discussed at a separate articles for deletion discussion. (non-admin closure)Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 14:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Miss GrandMiss Grand International – Move to "Miss Grand International" Should name article specifically and seperate Miss Grand Thailand from Miss Grand International.--Dinnerbrone (talk) 09:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

merging already done with Miss Grand International 2020 Estopedist1 (talk) 06:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Why it is not about miss grand it is only about miss grand international 2021 pageant . I want to complete all about this to Wikipedia because your all deleting my every creation your are targeting me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boboraks (talkcontribs) 07:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why you are merching this page I have given reference to all information why Boboraks (talk) 07:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is moot now, since Black Kite has already redirected the article. A merger wouldn't have been appropriate anyway. That said, I think discussion to reconsider the notability of Miss Grand International, and whether it warrants a standalone article (or a series of articles), is warranted, since the last AfD was four years ago, new sources have emerged, and consensus can change. Maybe the best venue in this case would be Deletion Review. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:08, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]