Talk:Mississippi Highway 350

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mississippi Highway 350/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TheWombatGuru (talk · contribs) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    The last two sentences of the intro both start with the route; the first part of the route description is fact after fact, it didn't really feel like a story. TheWombatGuru (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Changed the word, and the first part of the route description can't really be moved to other parts of the article.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 23:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    Maybe there's something to be said about the Tishomingo County Game Refuge? TheWombatGuru (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Other than being in the same county, there's no relation with the route.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 23:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Doesn't it pass through it? Google might be lying to me. TheWombatGuru (talk) 00:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Google lied to me. TheWombatGuru (talk) 00:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Why isn't it included as a part in the NHS? TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    USDOT usually doesn't say why a route is not in the system.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 23:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    It seems well written again, if the points I addressed are (if they should be) fixed, it may be passed. TheWombatGuru (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Passed.TheWombatGuru (talk) 00:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mississippi Highway 350. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:45, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]