Talk:Mississippi Highway 612/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cameron11598 (talk · contribs) 23:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Good work just a few minor things to correct.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
See comments
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
are there any images available that would improve the article?
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Good luck improving the article!

The start of the route description section could be worded better to make the topic clearer.
"At Red Creek Church Road, MS 612 travels southeast and into a larger forest"
- Not sure you need the "and"
"small forest" "larger forest" (in the route description section)
- Which forests?
History Section
- MS 612 was established in 1966, and it was part of a construction project in 1967, with a total cost of $611,248
  - Almost seems like a run-on sentence could probably be separated for better flow.
- The route has not been changed significantly since.[9][10]
  - Sentence Fragment

--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 00:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed all of them I think. The forest doesn't have a name. It's just a group of trees.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 23:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 23:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]