Talk:Mitchell Wade

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More Details -- Should there be a separate article?[edit]

First -- more details on MZM ripping off the Defense department (see, e.g., http://www.tpmcafe.com/node/27420, which can also be sourced at Wash Post).

Secondly -- this defense scandal might need it's own article, as different players were involved in different parts, not all of it overlapping. For example, Duke Cunningham and Wade were involved in some parts. But Wade was also trying to bribe a number of other Congressman (such as Katherine Harris) who had nothing to do with Cunningham. Separate and apart from anything Wade did was the bribery that wene on between Cunningham and Brent Wilkes. Then, in the meantime, Wilkes and Congressman John T. Doolittle were doing there own separate thing with Perfect Wave.

Thoughts? -- Sholom 16:32, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template etc[edit]

Looking at the improvement that the Abramoff template brought I thought it time to apply the same idea here. There is a huge overlap between this article and the Cunningham article. --Gorgonzilla 05:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Mitchell Wade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:54, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]