Talk:Mizuya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The area marked "Mizuya" in the diagram apparently is a rather oversized mizuya dōko. The diagram shows that it is open on the tearoom side and is enclosed by walls on the other three sides. No "backroom" mizuya area could be so small and have that configuration. I am therefore taking the liberty of deleting the diagram.Tksb (talk) 08:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tksb (talk) 02:16, 1 May 2011 (UTC)== Exact spelling of "doko"? == I have to admit I don't know anything about the characters used for transliteration of Japanese, but I see the word "dōko" used with two different diacritic sets. In this article, only the first "o"s has a bar over it; in other places in Wikipedia (such as a caption in Tatami#Use), both "o"s have bars.[reply]

A quick Google search shows both spellings are found out there. Is one of them correct, or are they both acceptable? Mavwreck (talk) 19:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The term is correctly pronunced dōko.Tksb (talk) 02:16, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mizuya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]