Talk:Mobile VoIP

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Networking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Quality of Service (QoS) issues[edit]

The article should mention the importance of QoS configuration for VoIP over WiFi. The default disabling of QoS engines means VoIP is useless in most WiFi networks. Jds13 (talk) 21:25, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of VoIP providers[edit]

I've started a list of providers. I believe there aren't that many, and I personally spent a fair amount of time to find the 2 I entered. I may be wrong, or the consensus may be against this list. 213.208.107.91 (talk) 02:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC) (or pol089)[reply]

Vyke is a provider of this service.Wiked2222 (talk) 10:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to add Vyke do you think? Wiked2222 (talk) 08:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In other words[edit]

In other words, in a simple and single word: IPv6.

IPv6 started in 1998. I started using it in 2001. Computing technologies usually spread in 6 months and have 2y life time. IPv6 should have spread by 1999, and be outdated before 2002. We are now in 2013, and nobody using it yet.

When you have mobile IPv6, and normal VoIP, you don't need mVoIP. Mobility is a transport detail; voice is a user level content; user level does not need to be aware of transport layer; talking about mobile voice is just wrong; what you need is legacy voice, plus mobile IPv6. There is nothing new here, fresh, or recent. It's pretty much old. The real question is: why doesn't any body use it yet, while everybody should use it since now 15 years ?

The most amazing thing is that this article describes, and tells all advantages of IPv6 without even mentioning it !!!

2A01:E35:8BA8:E140:213:CEFF:FED8:7684 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:53, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what IPV6 has to do with Mobile VoIP, which works fine with NAT and dynamic IPs Jds13 (talk)

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mobile VoIP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100714164102/http://wiki.forum.nokia.com/index.php/VoIP_support_in_Nokia_devices to http://wiki.forum.nokia.com/index.php/VoIP_support_in_Nokia_devices

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]