Talk:Modern Art Oxford

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

University of Oxford Mid‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contemporary Art (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Contemporary Art, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Contemporary ArtWikipedia:WikiProject Contemporary ArtTemplate:WikiProject Contemporary ArtContemporary Art articles

Notable exhibitions[edit]

Several editors have repeatedly restored the list of notable exhibitions, which have been repeatedly removed by Modern Art Oxford. Most of these were clearly notable and cited to multiple news reviews. All the same, I agree they were excessively written and won't reflect the very wide variety of exhibitions that have taken place at the gallery. The solution is to increase the list, not remove it. Sionk (talk) 17:01, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would also ask editors to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest: many recent edits have replaced well-referenced content with unreferenced promotional fluff. Ruby Murray 17:08, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At least it has prompted us to give some attention to this article, which was in much need of improvement ;) Sionk (talk) 17:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Modern Art Oxford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090327201454/http://www.modernartoxford.org.uk/media/pdf/180806_033937.pdf to http://www.modernartoxford.org.uk/media/pdf/180806_033937.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:16, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]