Talk:Mohabbatein

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

mohabbatein means...[edit]

I hear that mohabbatein means love. Is this true? Sanskrit or Hindi?

It means loves stories (from Mohabbat = love), as far as I know. --Plumcouch Talk2Me 11:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mohabbatein.jpg[edit]

Image:Mohabbatein.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plot[edit]

Why do people keep radically changing the plot seemingly every other day? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bollyjeff (talk • contribs) 14:06, 6 March 2012‎

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mohabbatein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:04, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mohabbatein/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I'm rying to find about sanjaya...i mean, sanjana's boyfiend "deepak". this articles states its "Raman Lamba", but when i click on his name, it says he is a deceased cricket player aged 38. he past away in 1998, and this movie came out in 2000...so its probably no him, or they have the same name, but that name is being linked to the deceased cricket player....can some one correct this? thanks...i'm want to know more about "deepak" (he's hot)71.163.145.97 18:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 00:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Sources[edit]

I don't know why you are posting this here, but your edits on the article look pretty good so far; keep up the good work. Bollyjeff | talk 20:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paragraph[edit]

Before the production of the film, Bachchan was attempting a revival of his career with little success, and was also in financial trouble with the bankruptcy of his production company, ABCL, not only hurting his image but leaving him almost penniless. It was at this time that Bachchan contacted his friend, director-producer Yash Chopra, who told him of an upcoming production that he could be in.[1] With Mohabbatein, Bachchan was finally able to shed his "hero" image and to play older, more mature roles.[1] This was also the first film in which Bachchan and Khan appeared together. This created a strong buzz for the film, as it brought two huge stars of different generations together.

Filming[edit]

A large country house in England
Longleat House (in the picture) was used as the location for the Gurukul School in the film.

Filming took place in India and England.[2] Longleat, a country house in Wiltshire, England, was used as the location of Gurukul. Oxford and Cambridge Universities were also used for filming. The scene where Narayan Shankar walks right before meeting Raj Aryan was filmed at the Queen's College, Oxford. The railway station scenes were shot at Apta Railway Station in Panvel, Maharashtra, India. The scene where Karan asks for friendship from Kiran was shot at Birla Mandir in Hyderabad, India. It was rumored that Sridevi was approached to be a love interest to Narayan Shankar, but she turned down the role.[3] Midway through the filming of the song "Aankhein Khuli", Jugal Hansraj fractured his foot, which required him to wear a cast for the rest of the filming of the song. Aishwarya Rai was slated to only make a guest appearance, but her presence generated so much interest that her role was promoted to that of a regular character.[4] --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 11:10, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ a b "The Sunday Tribune - Spectrum - Lead Article". Tribuneindia.com. 4 March 2001. Retrieved 2011-12-13.
  2. ^ "Asia Times Online :: South Asia news, business and economy from India and Pakistan". Atimes.com. 19 May 2006. Archived from the original on 1 June 2006. Retrieved 2011-12-13.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  3. ^ "The Sunday Tribune - Spectrum - Bollywood Bhelpuri". Tribuneindia.com. 12 March 2000. Retrieved 2011-12-13.
  4. ^ "Transcript of the Jugal Hansraj Chat". rediff.com. 29 November 2000. Retrieved 2011-12-13.

Removed text[edit]

CC-BY-SA declaration; text in this section removed from the article by me; see the page's history for full attribution. I've removed it because it's off-topic for its section or the article. I'm leaving it here in case its removal breaks any references and for the benefit of future editors. Baffle☿gab 22:27, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From "Production"[edit]

Chopra then narrated Mohabbatein to his father Yash Chopra, who was impressed by it; the latter also produced the film under his banner Yash Raj Films. In an interview with Screen, Yash Chopra described Mohabbatein as "a modern film, a film about today and it has all the ingredients of entertainment for people of all ages". He said the film shows the honour of Indian traditions and their values, adding; "On the whole Aditya has made a honest film, honest to God and honest to the audience who has given us so much".[1]

References

  1. ^ John, Ali Peter (20 October 2000). "Mohabbatein: Lets all believe in Love, Please". Screen. Archived from the original on 2 July 2002. Retrieved 23 March 2021.

Baffle☿gab 22:27, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Mohabbatein/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 14:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox, Lead[edit]

  • The reference for the budget (infobox) has the wrong title.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • This says the budget was ₹190 million, so recite it and change the budget everywhere to ₹120–190 million
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "second-highest grossing" → "second-highest-grossing"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add commas after Shah Rukh Khan, Jimmy Shergill, and "Academy Awards".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plot, Cast[edit]

  • In the last paragraph, add commas after "Sameer, Vicky" and "Sanjana, Ishika".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Other than that, the plot passes WP:FILMPLOT and the cast looks good.

Production[edit]

  • "highest grossing" → "highest-grossing"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "change his mind" → "changed his mind"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "made another" → "make another"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "a honest" → "an honest"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "role as Megha" → "role of Megha"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "tree male" → "three male"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "specially" → "specifically"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Recite references at the end of each quote.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Change uses of "..." (here and in other sections) to "[...]"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Music[edit]

  • Add a comma after Shah Rukh Khan.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Other than that, this section looks good.

Release, Critical reception[edit]

  • No issues here.

Accolades[edit]

  • Table looks good.

References, External links[edit]

  • Mark references from The Hindu with "|url-access=subcription".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress[edit]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mohabbatein&oldid=1204041118"