Talk:Mokshabhumi

Mokshabhumi was nominated as a Language and literature good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 19, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mokshabhumi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 15:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

permalink to version reviewed This article falls majorly short of the GA criterion of comprehensiveness. The lead is insufficiently long, the plot synopsis doesn't actually explain the plot (describe what exactly happens in the book), and the reception does not incorporate any reviews, but rather just lists the awards. Additionally, most book articles have a small Background section that describes the author and any background info about the book, like conceptualization and writing (see Tolkien: A Cultural Phenomenon). I'm willing to put it on hold for a couple of days if you want, but imo it would be better to take your time to work on it and renominate later. AryKun (talk) 15:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC) Courtesy ping @Wallflowernepal:[reply]

No response from nominator for over 1 week from the start of the review, so I have gone and failed it. AryKun (talk) 05:18, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]