Talk:Momiji Dolls

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 September 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Toys Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

September 2010[edit]

The reference list should include verifiable external sources rather than footnotes. Crysb (talk) 19:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Updating this article[edit]

I will be using this area for the updates I do to this article, in case anybody is curious. - Hydroxonium (talk) 14:08, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A number of the references used in this article are not online, but the information can be found by going to NewsLibrary.com and entering "Momiji Dolls" — with the quotes — in to the search form and searching. - Hydroxonium (talk) 11:50, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am the co-founder of Momiji. Momiji is a registered trade mark. The article implies that they are a traditional folk art and that Momiji is a generic term like the words 'Kokeshi'. This is not the case. A full history of our brand can be found on our official website www.lovemomiji.com in the 'story' section. We have attempted to make corrections in the past but they have always been dismissed. Mis-representation of Momiji is causing us problems. Our copyright and designs are being infringed as people believe them to be folk designs which are out of copyright. We work with young designers and have a responsibility to protect their work. I would be happy to answer any questions and I recognise that this is not a place for advertising or brand promotion. I would simply like it to be factually correct and to prevent further mis-understanding.

ClaireMomiji (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Momiji Dolls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20140709113944/http://www.kaartfanaat.nl/c-2118161/momiji/ to http://www.kaartfanaat.nl/c-2118161/momiji/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]