Talk:Monopulse radar

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Edited the information to explain the basics for how these systems work, including the monopulse tracking and calibration equation. Nanoatzin (talk) 00:16, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conical scan vs. Monopulse[edit]

Sorry, but Conical scan is something entirely different from the monopulse method. This section is completely wrong in this article. The first image has an incorrect description. This article needs to be completely revised. For the mathematical description is more suitable this image File:Monopulse principle.png. A detailed description can be found here. Maybe that can make someone who speaks better English than I do. --c.w. (talk) 09:31, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 March 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved - without prejudice as if the article is updated per comments below a move may gain some support. Mike Cline (talk) 19:24, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Monopulse radar → Monopulse – Monopulse is not just a radar technique. It is also used on many general RF receiver applications. Bluegold92 (talk) 14:09, 23 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 07:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think it's down to whether the article is just about the radar application, or about monopulse in general. Dr. Vogel (talk) 16:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The article appears to be primarily about radar, so I believe the title fits. I can't see a reason to move this unless significantly more content about other applications is added, but even that might belong elsewhere with hatnotes. I'm a bit confused about the "Conical scan" section which states its not a form of monopulse radar, but according to the article it is radar. I can't say whether it fits but it is a bit technical for me. (The article is really lacking in citations, fwiw) ASUKITE 15:12, 24 March 2022 (UTC) (not a !vote, this was copied from WP:RM/TR)15:14, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Technology has been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE 23:58, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Radio has been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE 23:58, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.