Talk:Monotyping

Berlin museum images

There are a pair of images in the de.wikipedia.org article for Monotype of the monotype machine on display in the Technical Museum in Berlin, but I don't know how to include them properly.

- Thats not for this page, but the other M Corp. one Johnbod 03:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

This article should be called Monotype really

even if disambiguation needed, which it would be. Johnbod 03:14, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

No, it should not, without further disambiguation in the title.

There are two completely separate meanings of the word monotype, one of which is capitalised and is the trademarked name of the Monotype machine, usually just called a Monotype by people (like me) who've actually used one, and the other, not capitalised, which refers to an individual print produced by the monotype process.

Lee-Anne (talk) 04:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

New merge proposal

support - is consistent with other techniques Johnbod 17:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Monoprinting, Monotyping?

What's the difference between Monoprinting and Monotyping? Bus stop 13:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Monotype machine

Monotype machine should point here rather than the Monotype Corporation site. Dothefandango (talk) 20:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

• No, it should not, as it is a completely different subject. Johnbod (talk) 00:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Indeed. The Monotype machine, or perhaps Monotype Supercaster, should have its own article, similar to the article describing the Linotype linecaster, and not be subsumed within an article about the company which developed and sold it. Lee-Anne (talk) 04:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

how does one find a machine for printing a monoprint? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.119.45 (talk) 16:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monotyping. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070224100213/http://www.mfa.org/collections/search_art.asp?recview=true to http://www.mfa.org/collections/search_art.asp?recview=true&id=265917&coll_keywords=&coll_accession=&coll_name=&coll_artist=Degas&coll_place=&coll_medium=&coll_culture=&coll_classification=Prints&coll_credit=&coll_provenance=&coll_location=&coll_has_images=&coll_on_view=&coll_sort=2&coll_sort_order=0&coll_view=0&coll_package=0&coll_start=11

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 4 February 2018 (UTC)