Talk:Moosewood Restaurant/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Significance[edit]

I'm not convinced this place is significant enough to be in Wikipedia. Mr. Shoeless (talk) 22:49, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interview[edit]

I interviewed two women- one a manager and the other a co-owner at Moosewood on Feb 11th 2008 and have removed claims that Mollie Katzen was a founder. Other corrections and additions have been made based upon my interview.

WP:FOOD Tagging[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 10:28, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moosewood is not Vegetarian[edit]

This is why Wikipedia fails. Idiots edit things without doing their homework. I went to Moosewood and interviewed them to confirm everything - almost everything was removed by some idiot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.242.12.28 (talk) 23:21, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Moosewood is by its own admission not vegetarian. --N-k (talk) 05:24, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you can find a source that confirms this, post a sentence and source it. That's how Wikipedia works. Wikipedia is a survey of existing literature, it's not a place for original research (such as an interview with the staff). - Kzirkel (talk) 13:45, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous sentence[edit]

"Moosewood co-founder Mollie Katzen has separately authored the best-selling Moosewood Cookbook and 11 other cookbooks which have no connection to the restaurant or the Collective."

Does the word "which" refer to "the best-selling Moosewood Cookbook and 11 other cookbooks"?

Or does it just refer to "11 other cookbooks"?

This is very sloppy writing. Especially since the provenance of the Moosewood Cookbook was the subject of a serious controversy.2601:200:C000:1A0:892A:2B96:D333:DDA8 (talk) 05:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]