Talk:Moral entrepreneur

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Moral entrepreneur article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

how does a moral entrepreneur affect the scare created about crack?

It should read ‘pro and anti-LGBT groups’, otherwise this item seems to lack neutrality.

Another books which can be used as a source[edit]

See, [1], it analyses moral entrepreneurs.--RekishiEJ (talk) 20:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

Throughout much of this article, sociological theories that seem somewhat tendentious are presented as facts. A re-write making it clear that the content expresses the view of a specific school of thought would be a great improvement. Nikolaj1905 (talk) 13:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Massive issues with neutrality[edit]

Trying to assign mothers drunk driving and others as manipulative demagogue status is beyond ridiculous. This entire article needs to be cleaned out even deleted and start over fresh 2601:1C0:CC01:3C0:219A:92B0:5E76:9FFF (talk) 11:34, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn’t refer to them as ‘manipulative demogogues’, where did that come from? It has a neutral definition of the term. 2607:FEA8:9281:1430:9C4:8B82:3DE4:40FF (talk) 04:16, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]