Talk:Ms. Foundation for Women

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The Charity Navigator ratings are difficult to understand without context. A potentially unintentional bias appears, simply because most readers will not understand the relative gravity of Charity Navigator ratings. In this example, a rating of 47.88, which reflects "slightly less than half of all dollars donated go to fund the programs of the Foundation" reads as a clear criticism.

As it turns out, the rating is also out of date. The current rating is much worse. This alone seems like a good reason to remove the rating.

If these ratings are to be included in the descriptions of charities, they ought to be fairly and universally applied, and applied with an eye toward dispelling the bias. Universal application is probably impractical, given the sheer number of charities and the probable lack of interest in making this sort of update (not all page administrators would see the same value in the ratings). Dispelling bias would probably be best handled by adding context, which might look like "For comparison, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) has a rating of 23.73, while the National Organization for Women (NOW) has a rating of 54.49." Note that two examples are given, one with a higher and one with a lower rating. Both are well known and well respected organizations. --70.89.118.121 (talk) 19:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ms. Foundation for Women. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:04, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]