Talk:MuLinux

Notability[edit]

If Google returns 41,100 articles about MuLinux we can not speak about Non-notable distro.

Yes we can. Please provide reliable and independent third party publications dealing with the subject if you want to see it kept. Plrk (talk) 11:21, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What about reviews published in July 2005 issue of Linux Format http://www.linuxformat.co.uk/pdfs/LXF68.round.pdf\ and ACM Indexed scientific base: Using Linux in Embedded and Real-Time Systems http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=349542 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.74.226.178 (talk) 12:31, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion notices, such as the one posted on MuLinux, can be removed by anyone at anytime. Please feel free to do so. Plrk (talk) 12:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thorough rewrite with added detail. Gwen Gale (talk) 04:56, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did more, along with many inline citations. Gwen Gale (talk) 18:26, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shit, men... The last version of this distro has been released in 2004... It's old dead shit. Nobody needs neither it, nor article about it. Go find a computer which will be able to run this, but won't be to run Puppy Linux, for example...

For example, any computer with faulty (or non existent in case of laptops) CD can use MuLinux but not Puppy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.65.172.175 (talk) 08:31, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it's mostly done and gone that's true, but the article is helpful and notable as a wee slice of background in computer science, this kind of thing wontedly being called history. Gwen Gale (talk) 13:23, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Having just checked the toolbox, yes, still have a MuLinux floppy. Yes, there are minimalist distributions that do more. The old ways should be remembered so that they can be understood, and the advances then appreciated. There was a period of about five years when it was a rare week I didn't use either a MuLinux floppy or a TOMSRTBT floppy to recover some ailing Windows box. htom (talk) 19:29, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was so very handy in its day :D Gwen Gale (talk) 19:53, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MuLinux. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:00, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]