Talk:Mukesh Batra

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

Misc awards and Times of India[edit]

I'm inclined to remove these miscellaneous and non-notable awards per WP:NOT especially WP:NOTNEWS. Moreover, I don't think awards reported only by TOI are itself an indication; given that he has a column there, this makes them affiliated.

"Network 7 Jury as "Indian of the Year 2014" : Network 7 in not notable.
" was conferred Business Leader of the year 2012 " : By TOI
"Indian Affairs Impact Award for Homeopathy at the 6th Annual India Leadership Conclave 2015, an initiative of Satya Brahma." India Leadership Conclave dubious notability. By TOI
"wins Salute Mumbai Award" award not notable, by TOI
"Pride of India Award at the Indo Thai Economic Co-Operation seminar", same.

I'm removing them per WP:BURDEN. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've added back India Leadership Conclave since it passes the bare minimum requirements for notability. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian scientists to alternative medicine practitioners[edit]

[moved from user talk to related wiki for the reason that interested wikimedians may discuss] Hello. I undid your change adding categories like Indian scientists to Mukesh Batra who is an homeopath. Doesn't that come under WP:FRINGE/PS? pseudosciences like homeopathy and alternative medicine cannot be treated as mainstream and adding such categories would be thus be a violation, wouldn't it? I notice you've done more such categorisation but haven't checked whether it's over such practitioner's biography pages. Better reevaluate those edits. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 08:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC) [moved from user talk to related wiki for the reason that interested wikimedians may discuss][reply]

Hi don't agree as Padma Shri awarded individuals rather are to be categorised as mentioned, regardless of their fields which I personally did not assess on occasion of that tiny one-time categorisation task last night. BTW related to just a handful of wikis within Indian physicians... . Hence, pls restore by undoing. Other opinions by interested wikimedians? Roland zh (talk) 11:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Categorised as mentioned"? So since he is in the cat "Recipients of the Padma Shri in medicine", you're saying that we should thus consider him a scientist ie category Indian scientist? That's wrong. Also, what you're proposing then doesn't involve the article on Batra but on the broader concept of whether alternative practitioners awarded the Padma Shri shoud be called scientists--which goes against our stance against WP:FRINGE/PS and the article on homeopathy. Categories should match the article and are subject to verifiability too. Just because the Indian government categorised it as medicine, doesn't mean we follow it, scientific and particularly medicine-related articles are subject to WP:MEDRS.

I'm sorry, I didn't understand the rest of what you've posted. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:38, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Further discussion Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard/Archive 52#Category:Indian homeopaths. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 06:42, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paid Cntribution[edit]

Creator of the article claims the subject's image. NANExcella (talk) 11:50, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]