Talk:Mullivaikkal Hospital bombings

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mullivaikkal Hospital bombings article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sri Lanka Low‑importance

	Sri Lanka portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / South Asia C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Terrorism questioned[edit]

One of the categories for this page is 2009 terrorism. Does this really qualify as terrorism? Is it proven that this was a deliberate strike? And if it was, would it be classified as terrorism, or as a war crime or genocide? Terrorism is usually defined as targeting civilians to make a political point or to bring attention to a political cause. The Sri Lanken military didn't shoot these civilians to bring attention to anything. If they did it deliberately, it was solely to kill, and that isn't terrorism, but pure genocide. 99.231.211.103 (talk) 08:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An interesting point, but the Sri Lankan government repeatedly denied these allegations, so if the incidents did happen, and there is evidence that they did, see the State Dept. 2009 report, they the perpetrators could be said to have had no governmental sanction and hence they were acts of terrorism, perhaps by rougue units of the GSL. On the other hand, people sometimes refer to "state terrorism" or "state sponsored terrorism" particularly in reference to the former Libyan administration, so maybe, if true, that is what this was. Genocide is an abused term. --Bejnar (talk) 00:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]