Talk:Multi-chip module

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Opening paragraph issues[edit]

I have a couple of issues with the opening paragraph:

Mentioning the term "chiplet." It irks me the source is another wiki that's editable by anyone.
Enough mentioning of Intel and AMD makes it feel like there's a bias towards those two companies pioneering the manufacturing paradigm, even though MCM manufacturing has been around for decades as noted by the examples.

ShuffyIosys (talk) 22:15, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ShuffyIosys is correct. "Chiplet" is a relatively modern term taken from a particular design approach to MCMs. In fact, the Power5 MCM that leads off the article does not use chiplets, it uses chips that were designed to be packaged and used separately.

Chiplets are generally single-function devices (such as a group of CPU cores, a GPU, a collection of I/O interfaces, etc.), smaller than complete standalone chips (particularly, small enough that die size does not substantially affect fab yield), and optimized for use only on an MCM substrate (for example, using I/O cells that will work only over short distances on a substrate and not over longer distances on an ordinary PC board). The topic of chiplets deserves a section of its own in this article, but it is wrong for the article to say that MCMs necessarily use chiplets. 67.188.1.213 (talk) 21:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After some research, I found from https://www.eetimes.com/chiplets-a-short-history/ that the term had been in circulation as early as 1969 from a patent, and apparently there was a spike in the search term on Google in 2004. However, I've found the distinction that chiplets are ICs that must be integrated together to form a larger component and cannot standalone is a common thread among the industry. ShuffyIosys (talk) 16:07, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Opening heading[edit]

A system in a package and MCM are different. A Pentium D is a MCM but is far from a system in a package. The picture of a Power5 is another example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.132.158.50 (talk)

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:43, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Multi-Chip Module → Multi-chip module — thats how it is — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frap (talk • contribs)

Agreed, I have added this move request to the "uncontroversial requests" section on WP:RM. -- intgr [talk] 19:55, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Multi-chip module. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160517191404/http%3A//www.aws.cit.ie/research/wirelessnodes/index.htm to http://www.aws.cit.ie/research/wirelessnodes/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:06, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]