Talk:Multicenter trial

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article IS important[edit]

I find that the topic of the article is notable and this article should remain. I agree that additional citations should be added for verification but the article should not be deleted. And if merged, the material in it should not be loosed. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 06:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article might be better as "Multicenter study"[edit]

...and thereby including all kinds of studies, not only medical, which are conducted repeatedly/simultaneously in more than one place/laboratory. E.g. the results of chemical analysis might change with environmental factors and the technicians handling. OxygenBlue (talk) 09:51, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Multicenter trial. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060202102901/http://www.ibpassociation.org/IBPA_articles/Role_of_ICH_GCP_and_Recruitment_Strategies_Training_of_Clinical_Sites_Staff_in_Successful_Patient_Recruitment_Rates.htm to http://www.ibpassociation.org/IBPA_articles/Role_of_ICH_GCP_and_Recruitment_Strategies_Training_of_Clinical_Sites_Staff_in_Successful_Patient_Recruitment_Rates.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:46, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]