Talk:Muskrat Falls Generating Station

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Muskrat Falls Generating Station article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Canada: Newfoundland & Labrador / The 10,000 Challenge Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Newfoundland and Labrador.
	This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dams High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Neutral Point of View?[edit]

The overview section has quite a few unreferenced opinions like "the government of Quebec refused to allow exports of electricity through its territory", "Quebec refused to renegotiate", and "due to the coersion involved in that deal".

The complex history of the contract between the Churchill Falls Labrador Corporation Limited (currently owned jointly by Nalcor Energy and Hydro Quebec, but a private company at the time) and Hydro Quebec, and of the multiple negotiations between these companies in the intervening years regarding development of the Lower Churchill is not fairly or neutrally recounted by this summary. The political sensitivities can't be ignored, they play a large role, but they should be referenced as such, not as fact.

I hope that this gets corrected, and that in particular that the background of the 1998 agreement between the NL and Quebec regarding developing the Lower Churchill, the 2006 decision to walk away from the joint development project with Hydro Quebec and Ontario, and the existing agreement between Nalcor and TransEnergie to transmit power from Labrador to New York get included because they are relevant to understanding the background of this project. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.123.250 (talk) 19:04, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite references and links for your assertions. The section you refer to has references from multiple sources supporting it. Ng.j (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to the 2014 Quebec superior court ruling for a bipartisan timeline and account of events ^[1]. According to documents presented in the court ruling, it seems the assertions in the current article highlighted above are unsubstantiated. In particular, court documents indicate clearly that the contract was entered in good faith by both parties (no coercion). The contract essentially transferred all financial risks to Hydro-Québec in exchange for fixed and predictable costs, which at the time seemed like a good deal to both parties. Concerning transmission of power to the grid, HQ had just developped the 735kV lines making the transmission of power feasible over such long distances. Without HQ's financial and technological involvement, court document underlines the plant would not have been built. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.23.204.208 (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article must be rewrote! It's pure disinformation!--76.65.131.106 (talk) 15:41, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://nalcorenergy.com/uploads/file/Quebec%20Superior%20Court%20Judgment%20Silcoff_July%2024%202014%20CF(L)CO.pdf

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lower Churchill Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lower Churchill Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:08, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Empty sections[edit]

I'd like to see the five empty sections at the bottom of the article deleted Dougmcdonell (talk) 19:05, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://nalcorenergy.com/uploads/file/Quebec%20Superior%20Court%20Judgment%20Silcoff_July%2024%202014%20CF(L)CO.pdf

[1]