Talk:NASA Astronaut Group 4/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starsandwhales (talk · contribs) 18:46, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Cleanup

• Article could be clearer if the citations were at the ends of sentences, instead of the ends of phrases. However, this is the editor's choice and doesn't make too much of a difference.

Copyediting

• The following section(s) need to be copyedited
  • The "Background" section should be copyedited because the many commas in some sentences can make them unclear and/or confusing.
  • The "Group members" section should be copyedited because the location of citations isn't consistent. Again, a minor issue.
  • The "Training" section should be copyedited because of incorrect use of semicolons, and unclear pronoun usage.

Miscellaneous remarks:

• Some images do not have alt text, and some of them do not have English captions on the commons.

Response

1. All sections have been copyedited. Spelling and grammar are correct.
2. The only semicolon in the Training section has been removed.
3. All citations in the Group members section are in the Ref column, as is usual for tables.
4. Alt text is not required, even at FAC level

All points have been addressed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:34, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.