Talk:NGC 6240
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Name Change[edit]
This galaxy is generally called NGC 6240. The name "Starfish Galaxy" appears to be unused outside of websites that copied Wikipedia and one amateur astronomer's website (who cannot call himself an authority on naming galaxies). The NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database and the SIMBAD database (linked to at the bottom of the article) do not list the name. Therefore, "Starfish Galaxy" is probably a generally unaccepted name.
If someone strongly objects to the renaming, please discuss it here. GeorgeJBendo 14:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Professional editing appreciated[edit]
The amount of information on this galaxy is somewhat overwhelming. I am certain that this article is far from complete after my edit on 17 Aug 2006. If any professional astronomer sees errors or wishes to insert missing information, they should feel free to do so. GeorgeJBendo 14:04, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on NGC 6240. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120330074938/http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2005-8/ to http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2005-8/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Last paragraph problems[edit]
It is misleading and needs editing, professional or otherwise. For example, it suggests that the galaxy will cease to exist in 10 or 20 MY, which is absurd. (Perhaps the collision might be said to end by then, but this would be a matter of our definition and judgment, not physics.) Jmacwiki (talk) 15:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Discrepancy in number of galaxies/black holes[edit]
One of the last paragraphs state that there are three galaxies/supermassive black holes in the merger which aligns with the introduction of the article, but the sources for the introduction state that there are two galaxies/SMBHs SightedStar (talk) 19:51, 11 September 2023 (UTC)