Talk:NGC 6251
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
NGC6251[edit]
NGC6251 should redirect here. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 13:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Galaxy size is not extended radio emission size.[edit]
The details are being discussed on my talk, but I figured I'd leave a note here. The ~2º size for NGC 6251 comes from its extended radio emission. This is not representative of the actual physical size of the galaxy, since it is likely due to old jets from a central AGN. The stellar light is closer to ~2' in extent, so galaxy's "size" is more like ~50kpc. Big, but not huge. - Parejkoj (talk) 16:59, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on NGC 6251. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100330094009/http://www.online-unit-converter.com/distance-and-length/ to http://www.online-unit-converter.com/distance-and-length/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC)