Talk:NTT Docomo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Music Porter X[edit]

Why am I redirected to this page from Music Porter X? The phrase "Music Porter X " does not appear in the article.

Thanks, Chris

Seconded-Same question. Mathiastck 22:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Probably the same reason meCard redirects here - looks like vandalism to me... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.63.232.6 (talk) 21:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

recent acquisition[edit]

NTT DoCoMo has been approved by the FCC to purchase three cell phone companies in Guam and Saipan for $72,000,000.Jlujan69 01:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC) In addition, they are now launching 3G on Hawaii in cooperation with AT&T.70.156.3.143 09:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

R&D spending[edit]

This section sounds like an advertisement for the company and I would argue that it should either be severely revised or removed entirely. --154.20.64.67 01:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Especially when it says that most cell companies don't do R&D but rather rely on their suppliers. --Darkpoet (talk) 07:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Logo Introduced[edit]

Docomo switched to a new logo as of today... I think it is wise to replace the current logo with the new logo... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bentoman (talk • contribs) 19:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking about the red font logo with "NTT" over "docomo"? I believe that logo was used in showing the list of sponsors for some shows.. since a few months ago. I'll replace it. --staka (T ・C) 14:59, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Or are you talking about the logo that was replaced a day ago in this article? Nippon Telegraph and Telephone --staka (T ・C) 15:04, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Official English Name[edit]

According to NTT docomo's Articles of Incorporation[1], its official English name is NTT DoCoMo, Inc., not NTT docomo, Inc. Also see page 182 of the latest 20-F. --Krtek2125 (talk) 11:25, 6 July 2009 (UTC) --Krtek2125 (talk) 11:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. For some reason Wikipedia seems to have a thing against nonstandard capitalization in page titles. The iPod touch article is an example of this; even though "touch" is officially not capitalized, it is capitalized in the title. Geekosaurus - 01:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They changed this again between 2010 and 2013. While the article was changed to reflect that, why isn't the title also NTT DOCOMO, INC.? 84.20.147.37 (talk) 12:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the camel-case notation is obsolete, the article title should be changed. Actually, the change was officially introduced with the new corporate identity at financial year 2008 (since April 2008), compare official press releases 2008.--2001:638:A0A:1192:91D2:6D30:DC0A:78FE (talk) 09:21, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved to NTT DoCoMo, but contact me if NTT Docomo is better. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 19:47, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NTT docomo → NTT Docomo — Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks), nonstandard capitalization in page titles, lowercase docomo has no meaning in English. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 15:05, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

PDC is terminated![edit]

quote: "It provides 2G (mova) PDC cellular services on the 800 MHz band". At the PDC page you can read. "NTT DoCoMo (mova brand): Service terminated on March 31, 2012" => inconsistency! Official information about termination: http://www.nttdocomo.com/pr/2009/001428.html --MichaelK-osm (talk) 17:19, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NTT DoCoMo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NTT DoCoMo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 November 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move the page to NTT Docomo at this time, per the discussion below; NTT DOCOMO created as a redirect to this article. Dekimasuよ! 03:22, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NTT DoCoMo → NTT DOCOMO – New name of the compnay, as described in the article. --2003:E7:EF10:6415:74A1:B04A:BD32:B270 (talk) 10:01, 24 November 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Iffy★Chat -- 14:48, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not true[edit]

My phone it's been Docomo Japan for more than 10 years now, and I just noticed that they are not CDMA, they're GSM. Or is it only my phone? Of course not, I went to a Docomo shop and asked about it and they said that they uses GSM technology. (You can check it on your phone's settings. ). So, I don't understand this article that says that Docomo is a creator of WCDMA, so, but they don't use it in Japan? Why?

I want to buy a phone that is not Docomo but I want to use Docomo, I love Docomo, but Docomo uses very old emojis( the first emojis of the world, they keep that shi until now, obliges you keeping using it) and they put it on all their phones. Not fun, no useful, no meaning. 49.106.202.139 (talk) 04:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tower Records gained 1%[edit]

As in the modification, the tower records holds the docomo.jp since 2018, the remaining points are gained least 1%. Johnjofercaalam (talk) 07:31, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:NTT_Docomo&oldid=1212607011"