Talk:NUnit

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[test fixture#Test fixture in xUnit|test fixture]] The anchor (#Test fixture in xUnit) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

It is my understanding NUnit.ASP does not really test the user interface. What it does is test server responses. This is different in that it does not trigger events in the UI like firing off Javascript etc. Unfortunately I have not been able to find a real NUnit extension that tests the web page as presented in a browser. I guess you would need a combo of COM and XPCOM api in a wrapper ( and one for the Safari K... based browsers) to build this type of framework extension 198.144.208.148 01:51, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison to CsUnit?[edit]

It would be nice to compare this framework to CsUnit kevinp2 (talk) 21:38, 25 August 2008 (UTC).[reply]

I added a See Also link to "List_of_unit_testing_frameworks#.NET_programming_languages", which includes CsUnit; at this point, with so many competing testing frameworks, I'm not sure which specific ones (if any) would be worth comparing within this article. Everrob (talk) 15:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Quandary[edit]

I'm the maintainer of NUnit. One of the users pointed me to this article and suggested I might want to edit it to make some corrections and add further details.

On the one hand, this seems like a good idea, since I'm in a position to provide an accurate information. That makes sense.

On the other hand, it appears that Wikipedia policies discourage or forbid this. This makes sense too - at least if one is writing subjectively (i.e NUnit is good or NUnit is bad) rather than displaying facts. And yet, it seems like an encyclopedia should only have facts anyway.

As you can guess, I'm new to Wikipedia, having set up this account with my real name for the sole purpose of making this post. I read some of the guidelines and decided that this is a COI situation and followed the suggestion to post on the talk page.

Any suggestions? Is there any better place to ask this question than on the page itself?

CharliePoole (talk) 17:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]