Talk:NYSE Euronext

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Renaming[edit]

Just a heads up that the merger is almost final. SEC approved the transaction, so the last step is that Euronext shareholders have to vote in a few days (with approval almost certain.) So we will need to rename this page in a few days to NYSE Euronext, Inc.. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 23:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, about renaming the New York Stock Exchange article to be NYSE Euronext. I am flatly opposed. The New York Stock Exchange is an historic institution. It's building is a U.S. National Historic Landmark. The purposes served by having an entry on the New York Stock Exchange for wikipedia readers are numerous. It suffices to have a separate article about the current parent corporate owner of NYSE, nyseEuro-whatever, as a separate article. doncram 22:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Joseph. First and foremost, NYSE refers to the financial institution and therefore, the article should reflect that. Now that the NYSE has merged with Euronext, the article must reflect the change. However, it is perfectly reasonable for the merged article to still contain information about the historic building as it does now. Cmcfarland 05:39, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose One must be clear that the New York Stock Exchange is an independent stock exchange, with a long heritage and still functions as a trading floor and listing place independent of the Euronext exchanges. On the contrary NYSE Euronext is a holding company that owns several stock exchanes. Each of these stock exchanges should have seperate articles, since they have their own trading and their own heritage. For most exchanges in the world, just their heritage should grant them an article, yet alone if they remain as independent floors. For that sake, if sufficent large amount of content was provided, there is nothing wrong with having a seperate article for the New York Stock Exchange building. Arsenikk 11:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fine. I change my stance to agree with Arsenikk. The current structure of the article with links to all the companies within the holding company is fine by me. Cmcfarland 20:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Separate corporate entities, dissimilar histories, different things entirely. Real-life merger does not necessitate a Wikipedia merger. Paul (talk) 17:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Paul. -- Typewritten (talk) 15:39, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Mergers aside, I feel the independent article is important for historical/archival purposes. Toczko.c (talk) 19:35, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on NYSE Euronext. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:32, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on NYSE Euronext. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:NYSE_Euronext&oldid=1208778945"