Talk:Nahariya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spelling[edit]

The municipality of Nahariya website (see external link on page) spells it Nahariya, so I guess that's official. Whether it is correct according to the Academy for the Hebrew Language is another issue; that I do not know. -- Y Ynhockey || Talk Y 10:54, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Academy puts a double Y because of the dagesh on the yod. I am fine with Nahariya. That is also what the JP and Haaretz in English would use. Gilgamesh, Izak or anyone else, is there an agreement by now on which transliteration standard to use? gidonb 14:50, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've only ever seen it with 2 y's when transliterated by people who are even more nitpicky about such things than I am (and yes, they exist)... Tomertalk 08:31, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Demographics and History[edit]

Was the municipality really started from nothing in the 1930's, or was there already a community there? It would be good if the history information reaches a little farther back. Also in demographics, "97.3% Jewish and non-Arabs" isn't very informative. Why combine Jews and non-Arabs into the same demographic group? I suggest a breakdown into at least Jewish, Arab, and "other" categories. CarlGH 10:19, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe 'Nahariya was founded in the 1930s' means just that - it was built from nothing in the 30s, granted, at the time it was a very small settlement. I will now update the article with bits of additional historic info from the Hebrew Wikipedia.
The other thing is Jews + non-Arabs, because the Israel Central Bureau of statistics makes all censuses in this way, dividing between Arabs and non-Arabs. Sometimes the non-Arabs are further divided into Jews and others, but I can't find the information for Nahariya on the CBS site, so I can't say if this is the case here. If you find another census, or the CBS subdivisions, feel free to update the article.
-- Ynhockey (Talk) 10:28, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(after edit conflict) Hi CarlGH, I believe that Nahariya was a new village in the 1930s on land that was bought to build that community. Please feel free to look for more information and add what you can find. Non-Arabs should indeed become "other", but only after the figure for Arabs is added. To separate Jews from "others" (3-4% of the Israelis) is usually difficult as the statistic is mostly given together with Jews. One of the reasons is that the overwhelming majority of the "others" are now family members of Jews who immigrated to Israel under the "law of return". Before the huge influx of "others" from the former USSR, the tiny "other" population (then perhaps 0.2% of the Israelis) was added to the Druze population. All Druze, almost all Muslims and a very large majority of the Christians are now summarized under Arabs. I think that the new classification lost detail, but even then it did not have the detail of the size of the "others". gidonb 10:40, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I cannot find Nahariya in the 1922 census of Palestine or the 1931 census of Palestine at all. In the Village Statistics, 1945 it had 1,440 inhabitants, all Jews: see Department of Statistics, 1945, p. 4, Huldra (talk) 21:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Name question[edit]

I take it that this city's name means "River of Hashem". If I'm correct, wouldn't it be more correct to say "River of the Lord"? I don't see any sources present for either name; otherwise I'd change it or not bring up the subject. Nyttend (talk) 13:15, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The name Nahariya came from the river(nahar in Hebrew)which runs across the city. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.64.16.190 (talk) 09:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Sail .jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:The Sail .jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:44, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nahariya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]