Talk:Names of Cambodia

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-08-06. The result of the discussion was keep.

Cambodia Mid‑importance

Names of Cambodia is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

Southeast Asia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled 2006 comment[edit]

Before placing irrelevant templates, discuss here to assess the historical importance of thi s article.

Sze cavalry01 18:49, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why repeat the same message over and over in all talk pages?. - Ganeshk (talk) 07:20, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On merger issue[edit]

THe article Kamboja does not qualifiy to be a candidate for merger with Kambojas and Kambodia. And Kambojas is already of size larger than required. Moreover, when Kambojas was created, it was suggested to break-up that article into a number of smaller articles under seperate headings. Hence, the merger suggestion is a retrograde step and will put it back to to square one again. Sze cavalry01 23:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ripped Article[edit]

The contents of this article appear to be ripped almost entirely from one source: http://www.kambojsociety.com/kambodia.asp. Not to mention the disregard for NPOV and encyclopedic presentation.--SohanDsouza 21:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article appears to be nothing but pseudoscience. The Khmer are not Indo-European, no credible scholar believes that. As SohanDsouza mentioned, the article also is completely lacking in NPOV and any semblance of an encyclopedic presentations (first person pronouns?).118.71.11.88 (talk) 09:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, no, the Khmer are not Indo-European, they're Indochinese. Their origin myth gives no origin for the name of the country, nor how they learned hydraulic engineering in Java. I had heard before that the Khmer are no relation to the Kom, and it was only by looking up the Kom that I found this article. I'm going to save a copy just in case someone deletes it. --Pawyilee (talk)