Talk:Nancy Baym

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 06:29, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prod[edit]

I'm removing the prod tag, as the author seems to have written a notable book [1]. I'll try to do some more fixing up later. -- Quiddity (talk) 18:43, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems clearly notable to me--founder of a major academic organization and author of a notable book. Per this discussion, I've removed the notability tag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asbruckman (talkcontribs) 14:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baym is a major figure in Internet Studies, and clearly meets the academic notability criteria, not just because of the book, but as past president and a founder of the Association of Internet Researchers. Also widely cited in the news media. -- Halavais (talk) 02:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Entirely unacceptable self-promotion[edit]

This person may very well be a significant educator in the field of media, but you wouldn't know it from this apparently self-submitted entry. I actually came here to learn about her, but I'm outie. Perhaps her university has a legitimate bio, or its alumni magazine. Anything but this, although I'm thrillllllled to learn that she has uploaded photos to her "flickr" page. That's Wikitastic!

Dstlascaux (talk) 23:10, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dstlascaux, I don't think it was self-promotion. Take a look at an earlier version of the article: [2]. After that, I think a class assignment took over... Drmies (talk) 17:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Early Life[edit]

Considering her level of influence, it would be helpful to include a section detailing her early life. --Duckori (talk) 05:51, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

A number of references in the section about her Personal life are missing references, and/or contain broken links, which need to be replaced. It would also help the credibility of the article to use more sources outside of her own website, publications, etc. --Duckori (talk) 05:53, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]