Talk:Nappa (Dragon Ball)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Importance - Merging[edit]

Nappa is a tertiary character. Lots of secondary and tertiary characters have already nonsensically been merged, so there's no logical reason that this even lesser character who appears in 11 episodes total and has one movie appearance to have his own page.

11 episodes? Are you taking into consideration the uncut episodes? Also, each episode is around 20 minutes, plus the 45 minute movie, puts him at least 4.5 hours of film. Lets not forget his manga appearances, and also that it's still read by millions of fans in dozens of countries. Oh yeah, his multiple appearances in the video game series, and face on merchandise, I bet fans want to learn more about him, and what better way to do that then read an article on him, instead of a couple sentences in a long list of "less-important" characters. I think he's pretty important. I say no to the merge because there are already tons of tertiary characters in the list, and he is way more important then most of them, giving himself his own article. Hucz 10:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This same person brought up a good argument in the other pages up for merger. Nappa truly isn't as important a character as Android 16 and General Blue. Since those characters have already been merged along with many many others who deserved their own pages, Nappa should be merged as well. I am definitely for this merger. - 69.86.243.244

Super Saiyan Nappa[edit]

If Nappa were to become SS would his moustache become gold? Or would he just have an aura? Just wonderin'.--suit-n-tie 10:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, an age old question. Similar to what if Radditz went Super Saiyan 3? :P The answer is, no one really knows. Tsukento 01:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

nappa the elite[edit]

how strong is nappa compared to other saiyan elites he says he was the Lieutenant of the saiyan army but bardock was recorded to have a high power level than nappa. User:Kami-Sama

Uh, says who? Burdock wasn't even mentioned until he appeared in the TV special. And even then, Bardock wasn't even a part of the Elite Saiyans. Burdock was part of the Lower Class Saiyans that destroyed the relatively weak planets. Tsukento 01:04, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yea but Bardock defeated Dodoria's elite squad and they must've had a high power level maybe around 5000 each, and don't forget bardock suffered a near death experience so he could have become much more powerful. Also Bardock flew through frieza's army quite easily something that im sure Nappa could not do. Bardock was just listed low level from brith as was Goku but we all know Goku truely became the most powerful saiyan so maybe they're was an exception with bardock as well.

Dose nappa cut his hair ?[edit]

is nappa actually bald because in the bardock speacial he is seen with hair and vegeta said a saiyans hair never changes from birth

Possibly a flub on Toei's part as they have a terrible time being consistant with things Toriyama writes into the manga. Another hair example would be Vegeta changing his hairstyle in GT. Tsukento 01:06, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remember GT is NOT canon. In DB continuity, Vegeta never cut his hair.--suit-n-tie 22:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing merge?[edit]

A couple of logged-out editors have reverted to undo this merge in the past couple of weeks. I'm not totally against that but I'd prefer to see the merits discussed. I've reverted to the merged version for now. --Tony Sidaway 11:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]