Talk:Nasreen Paracha/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 19:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments[edit]

  • Non-free use rationale on the image is in great condition.
  • "awarded awarded" → "awarded"
  • Add parts from every section to the lead to summarize the article.
  • The storylines section looks good.
  • As with other articles, recite references after every quote per WP:REF.
  • Try to reduce the use of quotes in #Development.
  • I couldn't find any actual issues at #Reception, but adding reviews from critics of her character would be nice.
  • Overall, remove quotes and expand the entire article, as it only has 8 references at the moment.
  • Archive all sources (either manually or with this tool).
  • The reference after "2020 RTS Yorkshire Awards" should not be linking to highlighted text.

Progress[edit]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·