This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
A better source of data on Nathan Mason would be the Huddersfield Giants website. Please see this link: [1]Michael Glass (talk) 12:58, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What's better about that one? Speccy4Eyes (talk) 19:31, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's the official club information for this player. Michael Glass (talk) 15:37, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How does that make it better? The player is firstly a person, secondly an employee of, or contracted to, a club. So long as a source is reliable it should be perfectly adequate. Speccy4Eyes (talk) 18:55, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion the official club information for the player's height and weight is likely to be more reliable than a report in the local newspaper. Of course, if the local paper had quoted the player as saying that his height is 2 metres/6ft 7inches or whatever, you might have a point. However, the Giants give Nathan's weight as 104kg, which is 16 stone 5.28 lbs or 8.72kg (3.955kg) lighter than the newspaper report. The Giants also give his height as 196cm or a little over 6ft 5in. This is 3cm taller than 6ft 4in in the local newspaper.
I believe that we should go with the official height and weight as given by the club in this instance, unless there are compelling reasons to do otherwise. Do you have any compelling reasons for using a different source of information for this player? (Of course, the display would have to be flipped to comply with the rules.) Michael Glass (talk) 13:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
