This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
This article has been largely copied-and-pasted from the Frankie Housley article and at the moment has the wrong name (flight 84 instead of National Airlines Flight 83, which has existed as a redirect for several years). The article name can be fairly-easily fixed, the copy-and-paste less so. YSSYguy (talk) 02:23, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
YSSYguy, I thought that C&P was likely, explains the 2008 retrieval dates on the refs. I had already dropped a note (or 2) on the 'creators' talk-page [1], [2]. I queried the 'unusual' page naming and notability. 220ofBorg 11:51, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Have up-dated those refs that haven't gone dead,= and requested a move below!--Petebutt (talk) 14:17, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved speedy. SSTflyer 10:47, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This seems uncontroversial. The article should have been created on top of the redirect and it wasn't. I would recommend filing a technical move request. —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 06:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy support – this is an noncontroversial move and should be moved via WP:G6. CookieMonster755𝚨-𝛀 19:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.