Talk:National Association of Insurance Commissioners

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kansas City Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about Kansas City, Missouri, and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kansas CityWikipedia:WikiProject Kansas CityTemplate:WikiProject Kansas CityKansas City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

References to NAIC as a regulator[edit]

I am reverting the latest edit by McTavidge because I believe his comments are unsubstantiated, and that this page should conform to the Wikipedia verifiability policy. I attempted to verify the entire page based on the NAIC's website (which is cited in the page) and do not believe the citation supports his statement. In fact, I have never heard the NAIC mistakenly referred to as a regulator. If McTavidge has a citation to the contrary I won't complain. Reasons are further explained at User_talk:McTavidge. Oblivy 04:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]