Talk:National Building Code of Canada

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alberta[edit]

The information on Alberta in the Implementation section is far more detailed than for any other province. Should it have its own subsection?--Jrsnbarn (talk) 15:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, along with several other provinces. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:35, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Provincial codes[edit]

The provincial code "implementations" section is very flawed. There is nothing special about Alberta or Ontario versus the other provinces that have created their own codes based on the provincial model. I will come back when I have some more time to properly update all of the provincial/municipal codes information. Right now I will do a light edit to correct some of the glaring errors, but I'll clean it all up a bit later. Webgeer (talk) 00:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What about New-Brunswick? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.118.116.102 (talk) 17:47, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

National Codes website states that New Brunswick is adopting NBC 2010 in early 2014, but a quick search doesn't turn up anything confirming this on the NB government's website. Spiegalr (talk) 17:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How about http://www.gnb.ca/legis/bill/FILE/56/3/Bill-75-e.htm Extremo88 (talk) 18:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

British Columbia has its own provincial building code in addition to Vancouver's Building Bylaw; Implementation section should be updated to reflect this. Spiegalr (talk) 17:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've since added a heading for BC (with a subheading for Vancouver). Spiegalr (talk) 16:59, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

History section/ "historic right"[edit]

"... In a few cases, municipalities have been given the historic right of writing their own building code ...". It implies that there is something "historic" (i.e.: distinctly memorable) about such a right. I suspect what the author of this sentence meant was that municipalities have historically been given the right. But I don't know enough about the topic to correct it on my own. Terry Thorgaard (talk) 16:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on National Building Code of Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:17, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]