Talk:National Environment Agency
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on National Environment Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/new-ceo-for-national-environment-agency/698974.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:13, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Controversies[edit]
Removed the section which contained rubbish - full of personal opinions, weasel words and only supported by personal blogs - just to make a political point. Anybody can have an opinion about anything, but just because one or two people say so on their blogs does not make it public consensus or reliable. Don't give undue weight to these sources.
I'm appalled that this vandalism actually stood for years on Wikipedia. --219.74.85.176 (talk) 14:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)